To answer the question between which of the two tools I had preferred when developing these webpages, I personally had preferred the ZURB tool, as I felt it created a much cleaner and more friendly and handy accessible structure to those who actually need structure and accessibility when they are browsing my webpages. ZURB give a much better impression to me because I felt like it had an easier structure to follow, and it generally just looks like a more professional website laid out versus something like the Twitter tool, would you pretty much just felt like a generic web page with some fancy fonts and text, which did not really make it stick out in the grand scheme of things compared to this tool, which really made this page stick out is something truly different and much more rare on my website than any of the other pages that I have developed to this point. Do not misunderstand me, I actually think that both tools are very good for anyone who is wanting to use them, as I felt it was a lot easier to make the Twitter tool work because it was simply just copying lines of code for the CSS formatting, whereas I had to totally re-develop the text and some of the layout for the ZURB tool, which took way longer to do and it was generally a little bit trickier, as some of the assets in the code were rearranged differently compared to how they appear on the actual webpage. I personally find merit in both, but between the two of them as a contest, I would say ZURB foundation is way better and more accessible in terms of appearance in general appeal, whereas Twitter just simply looks very basic and bare-bones with no real substance to back up the actual formatting of it. In terms of the insights that I had learned, I will definitely say that I learn how to make a page look better structure and have a general presence that looks more appealing to the audience versus something that looks simple and basic like most of my HTML pages, but I had designed them that way because I wanted to make sure that they looked simple and easy to use for anyone, as well as having the ability to make it look a lot more organized and methodical. but using these tools has really helped me understand a better sense of how to make these pages look the way they do, instead of simply just making a basic HTML page that has some of your most basic commands on it.I hope this answers all the questions revolving around this topic. I used speech to text on my phone in order to type all of this, so I hope my point comes across cleanly.
